So, what's the big deal.
If you have a shot where the background is too in focus and the image
would look better with the background out of focus, no problem. That's what Adobe Photoshop (CS6 or before)
is for. That's a hell of an excuse for
not knowing what the camera will be doing before you press the shutter. Today's image is pretty (really) straight for
a shot by me. Just a little touchup in
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 (LR4) and it never needed to go to CS6. A friend and I were out shooting a vintage
baseball game during this past summer.
He was using a 80 - 200 F2.8 lens and I was using some 70 - 300 F4.5 -
5.6 glass. Before the game we did some
informal portraits while the visiting team was warming up. He took a couple shots and said "I can't
throw the background far enough out of focus to make things
interesting". Duh! He had the faster glass and he couldn't get
some nice blur???? I turned around to
see what he was shooting. He was about
twenty five feet from his subject. I
asked what F-stop he was on. 2.8 Again.
Duh! What focal length? 200
Double duh! I looked at his
screen and just shook my head. He had a
little blur, but not enough to get that soft background you'd want for a
informal portrait. What was the
difference between his shot and mine?
Hit the "Read More" to find out.
Read more!
Monday, November 26, 2012
Controlling Blur In Camera, Not In Photoshop
Labels:
Adobe,
baseball,
CS6,
general interest,
Lightroom,
LR4,
Photoshop,
rambling,
recommendation
Friday, November 23, 2012
Turn Around - Lightroom Works Both Ways
Today's image shows what happens when you turn around when
you're shooting an iconic scene. While
we were in Maine last month we stayed at the Hotel Pemaquid in New HarborMaine. The thing that makes this hotel
somewhat unique is that it's (according to the website) 150 yards (meters) from
Pemaquid Light. Pemaquid Light is the
lighthouse found on the US Quarter (25 cent piece) featuring the State of
Maine. It's, at least, as iconic as is
Portland Head Light. Another interesting
fact is that the room rates are very reasonable. I'd guess that comes from the fact that it's
not likely that the hotel is someplace you'd just happen to pass. It's not like it's on a main road. But, the rooms have been newly
"restored" to their past glory.
From what the receptionist said, the Carriage House across the street
from the main building was (in part) "restored" through the work of
the owner's friend, Norm Abram of This Old House fame. The place is actually a pretty great place to
spend the night. Planning is
necessary. There are only two
restaurants within fifteen miles or so and they close by 8:00 PM. Convenience stores? You must be kidding. The hotel and light are about a half hour
south of Damariscotta, Maine. If you
like a drink or a bag of chips as a snack in the evening, you'd better get them
before leaving Route 1. But, this isn't
a travel blog. It's a photography
blog. So, to find out what happens when
you turnaround at an iconic spot, hit the "Read More".
Read more!
Monday, November 19, 2012
Hand Painting With Photoshop
There's all sorts of methods to jack up colors using Adobe
Photoshop CS6 (CS6) and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 (LR4). You can do a faux HDR (in CS6,
Image/Adjustments/HDR Toning). You can
use Hue/Saturation Adjustment Layers (Layers/New Adjustment Layer/"Hue/Saturation"). You can "paint" over an area and
change the Blend Mode to Color. But,
today's image is done in LR4 with a small assist from CS6. About 90% of what's been done was done in
LR4. To find out what was done, hit the
"Read More".
Read more!
Friday, November 16, 2012
Photoshop's CTRL/ALT/SHIFT/E Debunked
It happened again on Thursday. I watched an online tutorial and the person
was pushing the fact that whenever you got to a place using Adobe Photoshop CS6
to retouch a photograph that you wanted to have a place you could go back to
you should use the keyboard shortcut CTRL/ALT/SHIFT/E (CASE) to create a
composite of all the work you'd already done.
What CASE does is Merge all the Layers and put the result on its own
Layer. The tutorialist (is that a
word? It is now. Somebody's got to make up new words.) said
this would save all your Layers so you could go back and make any changes at a
later time. Bullsh**. What CASE does is
put a line in the sand that says "you can't go back further than this
point without scrapping all the work you did above". If
you've done five Layers of work and made the CASE move, then another nine and
CASE, then seventeen and another CASE and found out you had to make a change on
Layer three, you're screwed. You'd have
to dump twenty six Layers worth of work to make that change. Depending on what you were doing, that could
be hours of work down the drain. I can
think of one way to go back to Layer three and fix the
mistake/error/oversight/whatever.
Eliminate each of the composite Layers.
If that's the case, why would you bother creating them in the first
place? Dumb! There is a way to have your cake (make a
composite) and eat it (make changes to any Layer at any time) too. To find out what this magic trick is, hit the
"Read More".
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Wednesday Q&A: Removing Objects with Photoshop CS6
A couple of photographers I know asked recently about
"clearing the decks" as one of them put it. He had an assignment to shoot a public place,
but the editor said he didn't want to bother with any people being in the
scene. Since this was not a photojournalism
gig, where there are harsh penalties for "altering" the content of an
image, I figured he had a couple options.
He could go through the people in charge of the public space and get an
off hours shoot, or barge in and start telling folks to get out of the
area. The first case would take weeks to
go through all the paperwork and the second would be just downright rude. There was a timeline to get the image in and
this guy isn't the rude type, so a "perfect storm" of circumstance
was coming together to have Adobe Photoshop CS6 (or earlier versions) come to
the rescue. To find out what
"magic" happened to today's image to have clear sailing on the
highway, hit the "Read More".
Monday, November 12, 2012
Going Artsy With Photoshop CS6
I've got a website/e-store/tutorial site you've got to
checkout. It's Woody Walters DigitalPhoto Candy site. Today's image is a
first attempt to do something similar to what woody does so masterfully. He's out of Cedar Falls, Iowa, so I'd don't
think my emulation of his (and many others) technique here in Connecticut will
do him harm. If you don't know how to
make brushes. If you don't have a folder
full of smoke images. If you don't shoot
clouds every time the sky is full of big puffy, well lit clouds. If you've never done on OOB (Out Of the Box)
image (my first was about ten years ago).
Well, head on over to Woody's website.
He has brushes for sale. He has
backgrounds and textures and masks and all manner of things for sales. His site could be your one stop shopping
experience for setting up your own "Senior Portrait" digital studio. He should create a franchise situation out of
his talent. Today's image, being a first
attempt, meant I had to either create or gather up the components to be able take
a shot at trying it myself. To find out
about the components, where I got them and how i used them, hit the "read
More".
Read more!
Labels:
acknowledgement,
CS6,
Lightroom,
LR4,
Photoshop,
recommendation,
technique
Friday, November 9, 2012
The River Is Wide - Thanks To Photoshop Content Aware Scaling
Today's image is another from out recent road trip to Maine
and New Hampshire. The covered bridge in
the shot is just south of Conway NH along Route 16. As you cross a bridge, if you look to the
northwest you'll see the covered bridge.
As we drove by we saw several photographers standing on the Route 16
bridge shooting the scene. Every one of
them was standing on the bridge and shooting the "tourist"
version. I knew there had to be
"something" better. The west
side of the bridge was a straight drop down about sixteen feet. The east side offered a more gentle slope
with a weathered "trail" to the water. I walked down and it was pretty obvious that
the underside of the bridge was being used as shelter for some (or more than
one) person. I made sure I didn't
disturb anything and really didn't dare move anything. At the water's edge I got down to almost
water level and shot the scene. It was
an alright shot but needed more drama.
It got the needed "drama" in Adobe Photoshop CS6. To find out how the "drama" came
about, hit the "Read More".
Read more!
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Wednesday Q&A: how to put multiple copies of one picture photoshop
I've done a couple posts on using one image multiple times in Adobe Photoshop CS6. The first was using the same image (enlarged and blurred) as a background to the mainimage. That's one way to do it. The title of today's Q&A comes directly from a search query that brought someone to The Gallery. I don't think that first instance was what the seeker was looking for. I believe today's image portrays what many questioners are looking for. The most common use for this type of "putting multiple copies of a one shot on one printout page" is making a keepsake for Grandmother or selling sports cards. Something having (as in today's image) one 5 x 7, two 2.5 x 3.5 and four 2 x 2.5 inch copies (or other variations) on one sheet. In Adobe Photoshop CS4 it was easy. The Picture Package app was built right in. In Adobe Photoshop CS5 or CS6 it's not. But don't worry. Adobe hasn't completely abandoned us. They have it available as a free download. To find out where to get the elusive Picture Package, hit the "Read More".
Read more!
Monday, November 5, 2012
Photoshop Takes You Where No Man /Person Has Gone
One
nice thing about Adobe Photoshop CS6 (and those versions before) is that you
can go places in your mind and translate them to an image. Today's image (the main portion at least) is
at a parking area along the Kancamagus Highway in the White Mountains of New
Hampshire, USA, looking west. I'm pretty
sure hot air ballooning isn't allowed in the White's. The reason would be that hot air balloons go
where the breezes take you for as long as you have gas in the cylinder. Typically you have a "chase" crew
that follows the route of the balloon as closely as possible. That's so the crew can pick up the balloonist
when he/she comes down. That would be
sort of a problem in the White Mountains.
There's kind of a lack of roads to do the chasing. Imagine landing six or seven miles from the
closest road. I'd recommend a rather
big, burly guy as (at least) one of the crew.
Somebody's going to have to lug that empty gas cylinder out to the
nearest road, and those suckers aren't light. So, chances are hot air
ballooning in the White Mountains is at least frowned upon. But, with a little Photoshop magic, it's no
problem. Putting a balloon in the sky
would be easy. Heck, putting an Army
tank in the sky would be easy. Not
believable, just easy. To find out how
easy it was to put the balloon in the sky, hit the "Read More".
Friday, November 2, 2012
Post Sandy Thoughts
The lights came on last night. We were without power from Monday through the
day on Thursday. Something like 30% of
our little town is still without electricity.
Our next door neighbor had his first experience with a generator and
thought it was necessary to run it twenty four hours a day to keep his frozen
food frozen. He's young, he didn't know
any better. The fact that the generator
was just outside our bedroom window was not the best idea he had. We just went to the guest bedroom at the
opposite end of the house. Far enough
that we weren't bothered greatly by the sound.
His generator was still running when we got home last night. I went over and tapped on his door to let him
know he could probably turn the darn thing off now that power had been
restored. I asked him why he thought he
needed to run the gen. at 3:00 AM in the
morning. As expected, he said he thought
he needed it to keep his food frozen. I
said "come with me young man" and brought him to our kitchen. I opened the freezer and tossed him a piece
of chicken, still frozen solid. I asked
"was this your objective?".
Shocked, he asked how I had kept it frozen. Dry ice.
One of the things about dry ice is that it doesn't make noise. He went home better educated and vowed to use
dry ice a lot and the gen as little as possible if there was another
outage.
Another instance was while buying the dry ice. The guy in line in front of me wanted to make
small talk, so he started bitchin' about the utility company. Boy, did he pick the wrong guy. My Dad spent his adult life working for the
local utility company and I know how hard those guys work. We don't get a whole lot of thousand mile wide
hurricanes coming through meeting up with storm out of Canada. In our area the electric company has had a
campaign to cut back the trees on the side of the road with overhead wires,
based on pressure due to last year's storms.
That sounded like a plan to the governor. Like so many people, he didn't think it
through. One of the benefits (to the
hurricane) was it removed any protection those trees gave from preventing the
trees on the opposite side from having a clear shot at taking down wires on the
side of the street with the wires. The best, half laid, plans of mice and men ...
We didn't have power for
four days. Big whoop, it was four days
out of a lifetime. Don't get me wrong,
people on the coast (we're about twenty miles inland) got ravaged. Some won't have power for a year. Before they can get power they have to build
a house to put power to. "They"
said the storm "affected" sixty million people. Six million people lost power or more. Because of the population density in the
northeast 20% of the country's people got wacked by Sandy. Nobody more so than the people on the coast
of New Jersey. My hope is that people will
remain reasonable and no one who survived the hurricane will get killed in the
aftermath. That's a hope, but unfortunately,
not an expectation.
Read more!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)