Well, played hookie from working again yesterday. I was "supposed to be" cleaning out the spare bedroom. Getting rid of (or at east organizing) buckets of photographic bits and pieces. Instead, a friend suggested anyone interested should get together and go down to the New York Botanical Gardens. Sometimes you just can't say no to that kind of temptation. It didn't take a whole lot of persuading to get Doris' buy in on the caper. Flowers have been sort of her thing lately, taking equally good shots with both her Nikon and her Samsung cell phone. She has a very good eye, but I swear I'm going to "accidently" smash that phone because of the quality of the images she gets with it. Oh well, sometimes the gods are with you and sunlight finds it way to exactly the right spot. To find out how a couple of Luminosity Masks rounded out todays image, hit the "Read More". Read more!
Today's image is a case of what I would have done if this had been a studio shoot. It would have been possibly two light sources with snoots zeroed in on a specific flower. There may have been a couple flags (or gobos) used to keep any direct light from falling on the rest of the composition. In any case, that's what coulda, woulda, shoulda been done if the shot were taken in a controlled environment. Since it wasn't (it was taken on a photo walk in a park while on vacation) it had to be relit in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (LR) with a slight assist from Adobe Photoshop (PS). The trip over to PS was just for speed and convenience. The work done there could have been done in LR. I'd say about 90% of what was done was done using LR's Radial Filter. Another 5% was the Gradient Tool in LR and the rest was that quick trip to PS for some Dodging and Burning. For a little more detail (bad pun) hit the "Read More".Read more!
First a cute story about the Santa Claus clone in today's image. We were out to dinner with Doris' brother (aka the Santa Claus guy) the other night. A family a couple tables away included a little girl about three years old. I heard the murmur and the dad ask her who she saw at the table. With eyes as big as saucers she said it was "Santa". Well, Mom, Dad and the rest of the family went along with her and carried on the rouse. Her Dad took her to the restroom and as she passed, her eyes never wavered from looking at my brother-in-law. The rest of us might as well have been the croutons in the salad. No acknowledgement at all. She was fixated on "Santa". When they finished their meal and were preparing to leave the little girl said something to her Mom. I heard the magic word... Santa. Roland, who usually tries to give a gruff, biker look, bent down and motioned her over. The thrill was evident on her face as she looked up to her Dad for permission. He gave his head a nod toward our table and the little girl took off in a sprint (of about six feet) and threw a giant hug around her Santa's neck. As the hug ended Roland looked her in the eye and said "you be good". She put her hands over her mouth as she gasped "I will. I promise." She ran back over to her folks with one of the biggest smiles I've ever seen. As they left, the Dad looked over his shoulder and said "Thank you". Roland had a pretty big smile on his face too. To see what filter was used to adjust today's image, hit the "Read More". Read more!
We've been on vacation for the past few weeks. Did a road trip with Doris and her brother and his wife. About a week before leaving I was shooting an assignment when my "go to" vacation lens (an 18 - 200mm) broke. And I mean broke. I had the camera locked down on the tripod (or so I thought). Typically I'll wrap the strap around the legs of the tripod "just in case". That means "if it falls" it'll end up dangling by the strap between the legs of the tripod. Being in a rush I didn't follow my own (unwritten) rule and the camera didn't have that small bit of security on that day. Wouldn't ya know it, I grabbed the tripod to make a move and off popped the camera. First time ever. All those years of being cautious and the one time I rushed, bang. Well, the camera's a Nikon, so I wasn't too worried about it. One of the reasons to use a Nikon is because you can dropkick the sucker and nothing will happen. Same with Nikon lenses, ... usually. The lens hit the floor first and on such an angle as to pop the zoom housing ring out. It snapped back in okay, except for the fact that the 18 - 200 was more like a 35 - 135 now. Not good. I had about a week before starting on the road trip, so I ran the lens up to Precision Camera in Enfield Connecticut. Great bunch of people and very reputable, authorized repair facility, hoping they could turn it around before we left. No luck. To find out what the solution to going on vacation without my "travel" lens was, hit the "Read More". Read more!
Okay, it been a day since the launch of Adobe Lightroom CC (or 6 if you're going the purchase route rather than the subscription model). The first thing I noticed is that Adobe still ties LR to Photoshop with the official name being Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC (LR). I suppose the thinking is that LR is a subset of Adobe Photoshop CC. LR is the only product I can see that has the PS hook. I don't see Adobe Photoshop Illustrator CC. It's just Adobe Illustrator. Same with Premiere and the rest of their Creative Cloud offerings. My question would be "why"? LR is about as autonomous as you can get. It's a strict photographic entity. Why not cut it loose? But, that's about as nitpicking as you can get. The new LR is fantastic. Want to go through the highs and lows. Hit the "Read More". Read more!
I recently picked up a copy of Glyn Dewis’ new book titled “ThePhotoshop Workbook”.I’ve been a fan of
Glyn’s ever since Scott Kelby “discovered” him and started bringing him over to
“Photoshop World”.In the first chapter he
shows an image he made of a couple giraffes out on the savannah.I said to myself “self, we have a couple
images of giraffes from the Bronx Zoo”, hmmm.I thought I might be able to do a reasonable takeoff on his image.From his description it seemed he had a
fairly easy time extracting the animal from its original location.In the one I did, I didn’t have too much trouble,
but apparently more trouble the Glyn.Not a big deal, but it proved a point.I did want to make my image different enough from Glyn’s so no one would
thing I just filched his image.To find
out what I did and the differences between the two are, hit the “Read More”. Read more!
Somebody must have known. I was flipping through some Youtube videos over the weekend (there's nothing but junk on regular television anymore) and came across a session on Luminosity Masks (LM) in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (LR). I went back this morning to try to find the author/presenter. No luck. That's too bad, because I'd like to give him (it was a male voice) credit. (Whoever you are, either let me know or take this as having given you the credit you deserve.) [Update: Thanks to reader Steve who let me know the fellow's name was Wayne Fox. Here's the link.] A couple weeks ago I was playing around with Luminosity Masks in Adobe Photoshop (PS) and did a post on the subject. I figured, since you start out with the Channels Panel that LMs wouldn't be something you could play with in LR. Oops. Was I wrong. To find out about my first exploration of LMs in LR, hit the "Read More".
If you're looking through the blog and you see a shot that catches your fancy, it's probably for sale as a limited addition, signed and numbered print.
All prints are large format, starting at 16 x 20 and going up. Leave a note with your email address and we can discuss which prints are available, which are sold out and those that will never be available.
Prints can be purchased either mounted or mounted and framed.
Corporate purchases of multiple copies of prints are available.